Azure Logic Apps is a test that will inject the message to the Microsoft Azure Logic App. It will perform validation of the middleware platform outbound message as well as validate database entries created by the message processing in the backend ABAP based system.
Basic Information
...
Parameter name | Description | Example |
Logic App | Microsoft Azure Logic App name | ServiceOrderIn |
|---|
Backend Systems
...
Parameter name | Description | Example |
Backend system line for current doc. | This parameter points out the system where the reference backend document is stored. The value should be a system line described in the landscape configuration. Note: If Backend system line for the current doc. has the same value as the Backend system line for the reference doc. (for instance, both are S4/HANA) then the RFC connection between the systems will be maintained both in: a) the original environment of the reference document (for instance, production system) b) the environment where the current test case execution takes place (for instance, development system) If Backend system line for the current doc. is different than the Backend system line for the reference doc. then, the RFC connection will be maintained only in the environment of the current execution (for instance, development system), but for both system lines (like ECC and S4HANA) | ECC SAP_ERP
|
|---|---|---|
Backend system line for reference doc. | This parameter points out the system line where Int4 Suite should create test documents during test case execution. In most cases, reference documents and documents created during current test execution are stored in the same system line. However, suppose Int4 Suite is used in a migration scenario (for example, migration from ECC to S4/HANA). In that case, the documents might be created in the new system and then compared with the references from the old system. The value should be a system line described in the landscape configuration. Note: If Backend system line for the current doc. has the same value as the Backend system line for the reference doc. (for instance, both are S4/HANA) then the RFC connection between the systems will be maintained both in: a) the original environment of the reference document (for instance, production system) b) the environment where the current test case execution takes place (for instance, development system) If Backend system line for the current doc. is different than the Backend system line for the reference doc. then, the RFC connection will be maintained only in the environment of the current execution (for instance, development system), but for both system lines (like ECC and S4HANA) | S4HANA |
Database Validations
...
Parameter name | Description | Example |
Database validation ruleset | Reference database validation ruleset object name. Database validation ruleset specify how related backend validation should be performed. Specify tables, fields and join conditions for the backend validation. Buttons allow navigation to the chosen database validation ruleset and creation of a new database validation ruleset | GENERIC_SO |
|---|---|---|
Persist reference DB Data | When switched on, DB reference data will be fetched from backend system during test case creation. Otherwise, it will be fetched during test case execution. |
Variables
...
Variables are the container for values that can be used during testing. Each variable contains two values, the one that is calculated based on the reference message/document and the one that is calculated ad-hoc during test case execution.
...
Create button allows variable creation.
Parameter name | Description | Example |
Name | Variable technical name | VARIABLE_1 |
|---|---|---|
Description | Free text for variable description | Variable One |
Type | Type of variable processing | Read & Replace Find message Custom |
Scope | Scope determines the processing of procedures that generate unique values like, e.g., GUID or NUM_RANGE.
| Test Case Test Run |
Payload Validations
...
Output payloads after processing by Logic App are validated against previously stored references. This configuration enables adding rules with exceptions that will allow for differences.
File Type | Processing |
XML | |
JSON | |
Flat Files, X12, EDIFACT | Int4 Flat File Syntax or REGEX |
Parameter name | Description | Example |
Description | Free text for the exception rule | Field1 |
|---|---|---|
Expression Type | Expression type. Available options:
This field is optional for all interfaces where there is a single type of output. However, for interfaces that output might be both XML and flat file, it is mandatory to specify the expression type. | XPath |
Expression | Path pointing to the field/node where the exception should be applied. | //ORDER/DATE/text() (XPATH expression) or START_TAG(BGM+220+)&&END_TAG(+)&& (Flat file expression) or $.order.date (JSONPath expression) REGEX(BGM\+220\+(.*)\+) (REGEX expression) |
Rule | Rule to be applied to the field. |
|
| Marks the compared fields with yellow color as a "warning". |
|
| In case compared values are different Int4 Suite compares them with specified variable. If reference/current value pair from comparison matches variable values result is marked as "warning". Variable name used for checking the values has to be specified in the Processing Parameter column. |
|
| In case compared values are different Int4 Suite compares them with specified values in the Mapping Object. If reference/current value pair from comparison matches mapping values result is marked as "warning". Mapping Object name used for checking the values has to be specified in the Processing Parameter column. |
|
| Even if it is different in the content, it is not highlighted. |
|
Parameter | Used in correlation with Warning Rules. |
|
Execution Settings
Parameter name | Description | Example |
Debug Log | Int4 Suite will provide additional, more technical information in Test Execution Report during the running of the test cases if this parameter is set. Therefore, it is recommended to set this option initially and deactivate it when object definition is confirmed after executing the first test cases |
|
|---|---|---|
Display wait popup before validation | Wait Flag indicating if Int4 Suite should stop test case execution after sending test case message to middleware. Int4 Suite will show the confirmation box, and the user will decide to continue. This setting can execute manual follow-up actions before running the next test case or checking the validations. This setup works only with Execute via SAP GUI option of execution |
|
Delay between execution and validation
Parameter name | Description | Example |
For each test case | Delay (in seconds) between test case execution ( sending message) and checking the results. | 10 |
|---|---|---|
Once per test run | Delay (in seconds) between test run execution ( sending messages) and checking the results. | 60 |
Number Ranges
...
The number ranges allow generating new values for variables. Those values are used to substitute original document numbers or other values in reference messages.
...
Each Object Definition can contain an unlimited number of number ranges. This way, each variable declared in an object can use its specific number range.
Parameter name | Description | Example |
Number range | Provide a name for the number range. This name would be passed as a parameter in variable processing for actions that will generate values from it. | NUM_RAN |
|---|---|---|
Prefix | The alphanumeric characters to be appended at the beginning of the document number to separate original documents from source systems and the one created during Int4 Suite testing (optional). | INT4_ |
Low value | The first number of our range. | 1 |
High value | The last number of our range. | 999999 |
Current value | When the number range is used during testing, it would increment per each use. | 23 |
Suffix | The alphanumeric characters to be appended at the end of the document number to separate original documents from source systems and the one created during Int4 Suite testing (optional). | _TEST |
Add zeros | If this box is checked, zeros will be automatically appended to the beginning of the document number, such as 000500. |
|
Incr. per Test Run | If this indicator is selected, the number range is incrementing once per test run. If multiple test cases with the same Automation Object exist in the test run, they will receive the same value. |
|
Data Scrambling
...
A scramble list is a part of an automation object. For compliance purposes, for example, GDPR purposes, it's required to hide some of the test case fields. Thanks to the anonymizer feature, it's possible to select fields that hold sensitive values and decide what action should be taken to prevent them from being compromised.
Parameter name | Description | Example |
Rule Type | Rule type. Available options:
| Test Case Creation |
|---|---|---|
Rule | Specify scrambling rule name for identification. | NAME |
Method | Choose a scrambling method from a list. Available methods:
| HASH |
Expression Type | Expression type. Available options:
This field is optional for all interfaces where there is a single type of output. However, for interfaces that output might be both XML and flat file, it is mandatory to specify the expression type. | XPath |
Expression | Path pointing to the field/node where the exception should be applied. | //ORDER/DATE/text() (XPATH expression) or START_TAG(BGM+220+)&&END_TAG(+)&& (Flat file expression) or $.order.date (JSONPath expression) REGEX(BGM\+220\+(.*)\+) (REGEX expression) |
Parameter | Specify Processing Parameter suitable for a chosen scrambling method. | X (for Mask method), SHA1 (for HASH Method) |
Parameters
Parameter name | Description | Example |
HTTP RFC Destination | Type G RFC destination pointing to server where Logic App endpoint is deployed | AZURE_LA1_HTTP_DEST |
|---|---|---|
Direct HTTP URL | Relative URL pointing to Logic App endpoint | /workflows/12345/triggers/manual/paths/invoke/… |
HTTP Header | Optional list of HTTP headers to be added to the request | x-custom-header=12345 |
Action to get input payload | Action block from which we take the input payload | Http_Init |
Action to get output payload | Action block from which we take the output payload | Send_To_ECC |
Azure LA Resource Group | Optional parameter if the Azure Logic Apps uses different resource group than the one determined in the global configuration. | a-rs-group-002 |
Do not fail TC if DB reference not found | This flag determines if in the situation when DB validation for reference messages have not been found whether it should be treated as Error or Successful message. | Checked or 'X' - if reference document is not found test case will not be failed Unchecked or '' - if reference document is not found test case will be failed (default setting) |
Show XML in the original order (unsorted) | This flag determines if the lines of the file in the XML Comparison Report should be displayed in the original order or should be sorted alphabetically for a specific nodes. | Checked or 'X' - payload will not be sorted on the report Unchecked or '' - payload will be sorted alphabetically (default value) |
XSLT Transformations
XSLT Transformation can be applied on both Input and Output payloads and it is stored in a reference test case of type XSLT Transformation. To call XSLT Transformation during Test Case execution, Test Case number that is of type XSLT Transformation needs to be provided as an input to one of the below parameters.
Parameter name | Description |
Execute XSLT on input payload | Run XSLT Transformation on input payload before any other execution steps |
|---|---|
Execute XSLT on input payload after variable replacement | Run XSLT Transformation on input payload after variables are replaced with new values |
Execute XSLT on ref. output payload | Run XSLT Transformation on output reference message (output stored in Test Case as reference) |
Execute XSLT on cur. output payload | Run XSLT Transformation on current output message (output generated during Test Case execution) |
Example usage of XSLT transformations can be found here https://int4support.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/IUM/pages/1230602260/XSLT+transformation+examples#Different-order-of-XML-nodes-in-a-new-solution.