...
Parameter name | Description | Example |
Backend system line for current doc. | This parameter points out the system where the tested backend document is stored. The value should be a system line described in the landscape configuration. Note: If Backend system line for the current doc. has the same value as the Backend system line for the reference doc. (for instance, both are S4/HANA) then the RFC connection between the systems will be maintained both in: a) the original environment of the reference document (for instance, production system) b) the environment where the current test case execution takes place (for instance, development system) If Backend system line for the current doc. is different than the Backend system line for the reference doc. then, the RFC connection will be maintained only in the environment of the current execution (for instance, development system), but for both system lines (like ECC and S4HANA) | ECC SAP_ERP |
|---|---|---|
Backend system line for reference doc. | This parameter points out the system line where the reference documents are stored. The value should be a system line described in the landscape configuration. Note: If Backend system line for the current doc. has the same value as the Backend system line for the reference doc. (for instance, both are S4/HANA) then the RFC connection between the systems will be maintained both in: a) the original environment of the reference document (for instance, production system) b) the environment where the current test case execution takes place (for instance, development system) If Backend system line for the current doc. is different than the Backend system line for the reference doc. then, the RFC connection will be maintained only in the environment of the current execution (for instance, development system), but for both system lines (like ECC and S4HANA) | S4HANA |
Payload Matching
...
In scenarios with multiple outputs for the same receiver, there is a need to compare them based on the same order as reference documents used for test case creation.
Integration Platforms don’t guarantee that outputs will always be sent in the same order control; therefore, the solution is to sort the messages before comparison.
Parameter name | Description | Example |
Rule | Free text for rule name | Rule1 |
|---|---|---|
Expression Type | Expression type. Available options:
This field is optional for all interfaces where there is a single type of output. However, for interfaces that output might be both XML and flat file, it is mandatory to specify the expression type. | XPath |
Expression | Path pointing to the field/node where the exception should be applied. | //ORDER/DATE/text() (XPATH expression) or START_TAG(BGM+220+)&&END_TAG(+)&& (Flat file expression) or $.order.date (JSONPath expression) REGEX(BGM\+220\+(.*)\+) (REGEX expression) |
Rule Type | Rule type. Available options:
|
|
Parameter | Depending on Rule type:
or
|
|
Group | Free text grouping field. All rules with from the same group have to be fulfilled to match payloads. At least one group has to be fulfilled to match payloads.
Rules within group are linked with AND operator. Groups are linked with OR operator. |
|
Data Scrambling
...
A scramble list is a part of an automation object. For compliance purposes, for example, GDPR purposes, it's required to hide some of the test case fields. Thanks to the anonymizer feature, it's possible to select fields that hold sensitive values and decide what action should be taken to prevent them from being compromised.
...